22 Jun
2009
22 Jun
'09
14:53
Hi, On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Klaus Kämpf wrote:
evr doesn't change the Pool: more constness
Btw. all these const changes are useless in a way. I did much of this myself six months ago, and then threw away most of it again. The reason is that the compiler can't depend on const-ness (exactly because it can be cast away) on pointers, so it ignores it. Hence you get exactly the same code. What you do get is warnings for changes through such const pointers, so that is an argument for it, code cleanliness and documenting the intent. But it's a relatively weak one. Just wanted to mention it. Ciao, Michael.