Mailinglist Archive: zypp-devel (58 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [zypp-devel] where to maintaining zypp pacakges
- From: Michael Andres <ma@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:42:42 +0200
- Message-id: <200906191542.45933.ma@xxxxxxx>
On Friday 19 June 2009 15:37:00 Jiri Srain wrote:
!!! Sorry zypp:svn is the one to be deleted!
--
cu,
Michael Andres
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Key fingerprint = 2DFA 5D73 18B1 E7EF A862 27AC 3FB8 9E3A 27C6 B0E4
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Michael Andres YaST Development ma@xxxxxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
Maxfeldstrasse 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany, ++49 (0)911 - 740 53-0
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Dne pátek 19 Červen 2009 15:28:16 Michael Andres napsal(a):
On Friday 19 June 2009 13:25:45 Jano Kupec wrote:
Exactly. The problem is that in one point you can have a set of
packages that you want to submit to Factory, but in the next minute a
change from git master HEAD can appear there in some of the packages
that you did not want there.
Or is this not a problem? Don't we care what will go to Factory as long
as it passes the tests?
Well, we should not submitt to git:master, if our change isn't a
candidate for Factory. And if more than one package is affected, we
usually talk to each other.
One (not so big) problem i see with this is for example with
versioning. This way we will often submit packages having changes but
without increasing the version, or packages with changes made after the
version was increased.
This depends on how we maintain the version number when checking into
git:master. Actually there are several people using zypp::Head to test
new features (even on openSuSE-11.1). So we should try to maintain
reasonable version numbers.
Basically you are of course right. But as long as just we 4 are involved,
I don't feel urgent need. But let's wait until Duncan is back from
vacation.
Maybe we can tune Hudson to feed zypp::Head with each commit and do
snapshots for zypp::Factory on demand. Maybe we find some (half)
automated solution, that also gives feedback to the git repo (e.g by
tagging versions scheduled and accepted for factory).
AFAIK it's no longer used. yast:svn used to build against this, but
that's probably history. So we could delete it.
Let's do it (we'll someone please do it, i don't have the rights IIRC).
Duncan? Stano? Coolo? (delete obs yast:svn)
Why?
!!! Sorry zypp:svn is the one to be deleted!
--
cu,
Michael Andres
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Key fingerprint = 2DFA 5D73 18B1 E7EF A862 27AC 3FB8 9E3A 27C6 B0E4
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Michael Andres YaST Development ma@xxxxxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
Maxfeldstrasse 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany, ++49 (0)911 - 740 53-0
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |