Mailinglist Archive: zypp-devel (59 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [zypp-devel] Re: [Bug 447684] zypper dup no updating all packages? however zypper up does
- From: Stanislav Visnovsky <visnov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:27:54 +0100
- Message-id: <200811241327.54672.visnov@xxxxxxx>
On Monday 24 November 2008 11:53:33 Jan Kupec wrote:
I think this will not work, because
1) nobody will notice the summary
2) those who notice will be confused what is the exact meaning
Anyway, in verbose mode that might be helpful.
Stano
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Michael Andres wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008 09:55:11 Jan Kupec wrote:
bugzilla_noreply@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
--- Comment #2 from Michael Andres <ma@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-21 11:48:55
MST ---
The second one is not necessarily a bug, because the solver uses
different policies in 'dup' and 'up'. I suppose this will confuse
several people, as they don't know what's the command they want to use.
And as the zypper output is not very versbose, it's not that obvious
why those packages were not considered in 'dup'.
The question is what should zypper show to make it obvious. It would
need some additional info from the solver, currently it just gets which
packages are going to be installed and which removed - no hit why. Or is
there something more?
No, it's about zypper displaying just the package names. It might become
more obvious, if one sees more details about the packages changes.
sure, this is planned. I thought you have something else in mind - some
sort of explanations why some packages have or haven't been selected,
etc...
foo (upgrade 2.1 -> 2.2)
baa (downgrade 1.1 -> 0.9, arch i386 -> x_86_64)
reh (reinstall 1.1 -> 1.1, vendor packman -> openSUSE)
It might also be helpfull to display an abstract of the solver policies,
so one recognizes the different rules active for 'up' and 'dup'
allowdowngrade = 1
allowarchchange = 1
allowvendorchange = 1
allowuninstall = 0
..
If you now don't see 'reh' in 'zypper up', but see
allowvendorchange = 0
you know why it's not there without need to file a bugreport.
Yes, this is a good idea.
I think this will not work, because
1) nobody will notice the summary
2) those who notice will be confused what is the exact meaning
Anyway, in verbose mode that might be helpful.
Stano
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |