Mailinglist Archive: zypp-devel (227 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [zypp-devel] selecting patches by issue
- From: Michael Schroeder <mls@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:05:32 +0200
- Message-id: <20080414130532.GA14605@xxxxxxx>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:58:18PM +0200, Martin Vidner wrote:
I'm also against it because I think the user should be able to
read the contraindications and description of the patch. So
magically installing some patch doesn't sound like the way to go.
M.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:18:23PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
- Use the solver, and during parsing inject something like
provides:fix(bugzilla:23444) when filling the repodata. Then applications
could inject a requires in the solver fix(bugzilla:23444) and just solve.
I
dont't know the consequences of this.
I don't think this would be a good idea.
Why? Because of flooding the solver with unnecessary data? We do that all the
time with autoprovides don't we?
I'm also against it because I think the user should be able to
read the contraindications and description of the patch. So
magically installing some patch doesn't sound like the way to go.
M.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |