Mailinglist Archive: zypp-devel (148 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [zypp-devel] api proposal for locks
- From: Stefan Hundhammer <sh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:21:18 +0100
- Message-id: <200803271621.19011.sh@xxxxxxx>
On Thursday 27 March 2008 16:17, Stanislav Visnovsky wrote:
Hm - is the number really meaningful? I think I'd like to keep the original
kernel (the one I got during installation), the last one I consider stable,
and maybe the last 2-3 kernels of the day. It would probably be hard to
express this in rules.
CU
--
Stefan Hundhammer <sh@xxxxxxx> Penguin by conviction.
YaST2 Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Nürnberg, Germany
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- the locks file format will be extended to include resolvable kind. The
question is whether we want to support also something else
(architecture, vendor, ...)
repository (stick to repo)
<dreaming>number of installed instances of the package</dreaming> - might
be useful to maintain the number of installed kernels.
Hm - is the number really meaningful? I think I'd like to keep the original
kernel (the one I got during installation), the last one I consider stable,
and maybe the last 2-3 kernels of the day. It would probably be hard to
express this in rules.
CU
--
Stefan Hundhammer <sh@xxxxxxx> Penguin by conviction.
YaST2 Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Nürnberg, Germany
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |