Mailinglist Archive: zypp-devel (148 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [yast-devel] Re: [zypp-devel] libzypp-4.6.1: Allow prioritizing repos.
- From: Klaus Kaempf <kkaempf@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:12:31 +0100
- Message-id: <20080327141231.GA9172@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett <dmacvicar@xxxxxxx> [Mar 27. 2008 14:47]:
Well, it should IMHO. Since it helps the solver to decide whats a
'best' package is:
repository openSUSE with priority 99 containing package foo-0.9-stable
repository Experimental with priority 50 containing package foo-1.1-unstable
An innocent user requesting the installation of 'foo' should get
foo-0.9, since its probably the 'best' from a distribution and
maintenance/support perspective.
An experienced user might want to change priorities, willing to take
the risk of a 'leading edge' version of 'foo'.
Klaus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Example situation:
repository X with priority 99 containing package foo-1.0
repository Y with priority 90 containing package foo-0.9
repository Z with priority 95 containing package foo-1.0
I don't think the solver is influenced yet.
Well, it should IMHO. Since it helps the solver to decide whats a
'best' package is:
repository openSUSE with priority 99 containing package foo-0.9-stable
repository Experimental with priority 50 containing package foo-1.1-unstable
An innocent user requesting the installation of 'foo' should get
foo-0.9, since its probably the 'best' from a distribution and
maintenance/support perspective.
An experienced user might want to change priorities, willing to take
the risk of a 'leading edge' version of 'foo'.
From my POV, this is the whole point of having repository priorities.
Klaus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |