Mailinglist Archive: zypp-devel (56 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [zypp-devel] Honoured dependency types
- From: Klaus Kaempf <kkaempf@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:06:22 +0100
- Message-id: <20071217110622.GA3399@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@xxxxxxx> [Dec 07. 2007 08:13]:
Yes. If not, it would count as a bug ;-)
Well, the basic rule is 'equal semantics for all resolvables'. So yes,
recommends do trigger for patches also.
That said, I do agree with your conclusion, a patch should not
recommend anything. Instead, a second, optional patch should exists to
pull in a new, recommended package.
Klaus
---
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi:
Are all of the Dependency types listed here:
http://en.opensuse.org/Software_Management/Dependencies
Honoured by zypp ? especifically the "weak, conditional and reverse
dependencies" ?
Yes. If not, it would count as a bug ;-)
if so, what are the rules of the game? f.e Reccommends is triggered on
patches too, which is a quite unexpected behaviuor, a "patch" in my
understanding corrects an already installed package and only pull new
ones when they are stricly "Required".. ;-)
Well, the basic rule is 'equal semantics for all resolvables'. So yes,
recommends do trigger for patches also.
That said, I do agree with your conclusion, a patch should not
recommend anything. Instead, a second, optional patch should exists to
pull in a new, recommended package.
Klaus
---
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |