On 30.05.2017 14:22, Ancor Gonzalez Sosa wrote:
So there are some features we can trade in exchange for the missing ones (whatever they are). :-)
But first at all we should deliver a good replacement for the storage stack.
In the ideal case, it would be a drop-in replacement; but most likely we
might be missing some (probably more exotic) features the old one had.
But being reasonably feature-complete, and, more importantly, robust, should
be our main goal. We should focus on that and not introduce all kinds of new
things that nobody asked for. We don't exactly feel bored with the amount of
things that are still left to do.
Kind regards
--
Stefan Hundhammer