Mailinglist Archive: yast-devel (191 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [yast-devel] extra-packages
- From: Lukas Ocilka <lukas.ocilka@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:45:55 +0100
- Message-id: <47E26A93.2080702@xxxxxxx>
Lukas Ocilka napsal(a):
Hmm, while checking the list ... I've realized that, for instance, those
packages listed for yast2-installation should go somewhere else.
* Bootloader (milo, aboot, cpml_ev5, cpml_ev6)
* Base pattern (sudo)
* Enhanced base PPC patterm (ibmsis, scsi, mouseemu, pbbuttonsd,
powerprefs, mol, powerpc-utils)
* ... no idea for (fpswa, numactl)
L.
Andreas Jaeger napsal(a):
Lukas Ocilka <lukas.ocilka@xxxxxxx> writes:
But finally I've found that some currently NOARCH packages use severalAre those requirements still current and correct? Could you give us the
"#if defined(__$arch__)" in that extra-packages file. So moving the
content to "Suggests: $package" would mean transforming some NOARCH
packages to architecture-dependent just because of suggested packages :(
list, please?
File attached.
For simplicity only those "Suggested:$packagename" that are marked
architecture-dependent are listed there. For instance yast2-installation
has some more but they appear to be NOARCH, so they don't change anything.
NOARCH YaST packages affected:
* yast2-installation
* yast2-samba-client
* yast2-kerberos-client
Hmm, while checking the list ... I've realized that, for instance, those
packages listed for yast2-installation should go somewhere else.
* Bootloader (milo, aboot, cpml_ev5, cpml_ev6)
* Base pattern (sudo)
* Enhanced base PPC patterm (ibmsis, scsi, mouseemu, pbbuttonsd,
powerprefs, mol, powerpc-utils)
* ... no idea for (fpswa, numactl)
L.
| < Previous | Next > |