Mailinglist Archive: yast-devel (101 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [yast-devel] Re: better framework for module interaction?
- From: Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett <dmacvicar@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:12:45 +0100
- Message-id: <200801171312.46410.dmacvicar@xxxxxxx>
On Thursday 17 January 2008 11:08:58 you wrote:
I am not sure if broken is the word.
In every piece of software, concurrency is a balance between granularity and
simplicity.
What introduced the big lock, was the design of having a ZYpp god global
object. But if we don't have it, people complain because API is too
complicated.
Duncan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, libzypp locking is still broken.
I am not sure if broken is the word.
In every piece of software, concurrency is a balance between granularity and
simplicity.
What introduced the big lock, was the design of having a ZYpp god global
object. But if we don't have it, people complain because API is too
complicated.
Duncan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |