Mailinglist Archive: yast-devel (85 mails)

[Pascal Bleser <pascal.bleser@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jiri Srain wrote:
...
> Do we want to call these packages -doc? It may be confusing, one may expect 
> the end-user documentation in these packages, but what he finds is (mostly) 
> the autogenerated documentation targeted for developers.
> 
> We already have eg. the yast2-devel package which contains only documentation 
> for developers. I'd find it consistent calling the packages this way (eg. 
> yast2-installatoin-devel in thexample above).
> 
> I checked with local packagers, there is no rule on how such packages should 
> be caleld. There are already some -devel-doc packages in autobuild, but they 
> are just about five.
> 
> Any other ideas?

- -devel-doc sounds straightforward and sane to me.

cheers
- --
  -o) Pascal Bleser     http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
  /\\ <pascal.bleser@xxxxxxxxx>       <guru@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGpg/Wr3NMWliFcXcRAruIAKCkhjt4X7DPetAVFXGsMgK/lsAbFwCfeRSM
/cPx+xdNrK2uhLqzDUydq0o=
=gEtl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx