Hello, On Jun 20 09:32 Rebecca Walter wrote (shortened):
Pascal Bleser
wrote: It's even much simpler than that: "repository" is the only correct technical term. Period.
Rebecca, just have a look at how other Linux distributions have been calling those things since many years.
If you think this is a discussion, you misunderstood something. This is decided as part of the opensuse-style project that was announced months ago. Discussion is already closed on this item. Installation Source is the only term allowed in program texts so development might as well start fixing it.
If you had an interest in terminology, you should have paid attention to the announcement.
10.3 is expected to be a transitional release while the official terminology is implemented. After 10.3, any variation in SUSE developed programs and manuals will be considered a bug.
Rebecca, is it perhaps you who terrible misunderstand something here? Perhaps you missed to take into account that YaST development happens now via a public accessible mailing list and therefore it might seem arrogant how you teach community members what they must do according to your internal guidelines and announcements. I think that we should definitely appreciate any reasonable input regarding YaST development from community members because otherwise we should make YaST non-free software with a non-public YaST development mailing list. Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany AG Nuernberg, HRB 16746, GF: Markus Rex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@opensuse.org