Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (271 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [radeonhd] radeon vs radeonhd
- From: Egbert Eich <eich@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:32:22 +0100
- Message-id: <19210.40182.677997.663479@xxxxxxx>
Pierpaolo Follia writes:
Tiling is one difference that causes radeonhd to be slightly slower.
I say 'slightly' as it didn't seem to be responsible for the entire
performance drop; what I've seen is a performance drop due to PM.
We set the RHD_PM_IDLE level by default while the BIOS default should be
something like RHD_PM_FAST_3D.
Also commit be7216fca95 caused some performance impact for me: the
virtual size selected just requires too much memory.
Cheers,
Egbert.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 19:44, Matthias Hopf <mhopf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Known issue: radeonhd doesn't do tiling (yet).
Ok, I'll wait for the "tiling readeonhd" version :)
Thank you very much.
Tiling is one difference that causes radeonhd to be slightly slower.
I say 'slightly' as it didn't seem to be responsible for the entire
performance drop; what I've seen is a performance drop due to PM.
We set the RHD_PM_IDLE level by default while the BIOS default should be
something like RHD_PM_FAST_3D.
Also commit be7216fca95 caused some performance impact for me: the
virtual size selected just requires too much memory.
Cheers,
Egbert.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |