Matthias Hopf wrote:
On Nov 01, 09 08:47:30 -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
Oh, the wording confused me: (II) RADEONHD(0): Using only 262144kB of the total 1048576kB. I would have understood better if the message read "Mapping" instead of "Using".
Good point. Changing that, we got this comment too often :-)
Saw the commit of that change on the list before reading this. Thanks.
(II) RADEONHD(0): Using 3840x1920 Framebuffer with 3840 pitch (II) RADEONHD(0): FB: Allocated ScanoutBuffer at offset 0x00008000 (size = 0x01C20000) (**) RADEONHD(0): Display dimensions: (518, 324) mm (**) RADEONHD(0): DPI set to (188, 150) ...
* >>>> 6. The DPI 188,150 value is totally bogus. The 'xdpyinfo' utility reports
94 x 94 with X running.
Seems like it's calculating the DPI from total framebuffer size instead of actual display size. Should be a harmless cosmetic error. OK, thanks.
It not necessarily harmless - toolkits could choose weird font sizes because of this. This used to be an Xserver error, I wonder what is wrong now?
The server actually reports a DPI of 94x94, as I mentioned on the line marked with the asterisk above. I didn't bring it up to complain, only to point out that radeonhd is miscalculating somehow (even though X is not). Dave W. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@opensuse.org