On Oct 31, 09 22:28:31 -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
(II) RADEONHD(0): Power Management: Raw Ranges (II) RADEONHD(0): Minimum 250000 kHz / 250000 kHz / 0.892 V (II) RADEONHD(0): Maximum 768000 kHz / 1152000 kHz / 1.158 V (II) RADEONHD(0): Default 640000 kHz / 960000 kHz / 1.123 V (II) RADEONHD(0): PowerPlayInfo Revision 0401 (II) RADEONHD(0): Power Management: Validated Ranges (II) RADEONHD(0): Minimum 250000 kHz / 250000 kHz / 0.892 V (II) RADEONHD(0): Maximum 768000 kHz / 1152000 kHz / 65.281 V (II) RADEONHD(0): Default 640000 kHz / 960000 kHz / 1.123 V (II) RADEONHD(0): Power Management: Known Good Configurations (II) RADEONHD(0): 1 625000 kHz / 993000 kHz / 65.281 V (II) RADEONHD(0): 2 500000 kHz / 960000 kHz / 1.046 V (II) RADEONHD(0): 3 500000 kHz / 960000 kHz / 1.046 V (II) RADEONHD(0): 4 640000 kHz / 960000 kHz / 65.281 V (II) RADEONHD(0): 5 640000 kHz / 960000 kHz / 65.281 V (II) RADEONHD(0): 6 640000 kHz / 960000 kHz / 65.281 V (II) RADEONHD(0): 7 640000 kHz / 960000 kHz / 65.281 V (II) RADEONHD(0): 8 500000 kHz / 960000 kHz / 1.084 V (II) RADEONHD(0): 9 500000 kHz / 960000 kHz / 1.084 V
Uh-oh. The voltage levels look really broken. Can you post a BIOS here (you can get it with rhd_conntest -d [PCI-Id]) so I can verify what's happening here? Maybe also retry with git master, Egbert fixed an out-of-bounds access.
5. Those 65.281 V voltages in the Power Management section look scary. You folks aren't going to fry my new card, are you?! ;)
Luckily, you're safe, because of two things: - Voltage setting is not implemented yet ;-) - The AtomBIOS routines seem to validate the voltage against their maximum range
6. The DPI 188,150 value is totally bogus. The 'xdpyinfo' utility reports 94 x 94 with X running.
Ok, as long as the DPI value reported by xdpyinfo is ok, this is only
cosmetic.
Matthias
--
Matthias Hopf