Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (288 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [radeonhd] 0x95C5:0x174B:0xE400: Sapphire Radeon 3450HD
- From: Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik <ruskie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:17:29 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0907271316250.9276@freya>
:2009-07-27T12:01:Matthias Hopf:
This is when it's connected via the adapter. I have no DVI capable
displays all are VGA only and one of them connects through DVI<->VGA
adapter. For some reason it gets detected as digital while it should be
analog.
--
Andraž ruskie Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games/Xorg grimoire guru
Re-Alpine Coordinator http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-alpine/
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend your right to say it.
On Jul 25, 09 23:17:28 +0200, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
Fails to detect my other display that goes through DVI Analog connector
and a KVM. Older radeon driver has no problems with it.
(II) RADEONHD(0): Output VGA_1 using initial mode 1280x1024
(II) RADEONHD(0): Output DVI-I_1/digital using initial mode 1280x1024
Currently you have the monitor connected via DVI. I need the log when it
is connected via adapter (i.e. when it fails to detect).
This is when it's connected via the adapter. I have no DVI capable
displays all are VGA only and one of them connects through DVI<->VGA
adapter. For some reason it gets detected as digital while it should be
analog.
--
Andraž ruskie Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games/Xorg grimoire guru
Re-Alpine Coordinator http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-alpine/
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend your right to say it.
| < Previous | Next > |