Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (288 mails)

[Matthias Hopf <mhopf@xxxxxxx>]

On Jul 02, 09 09:08:10 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Matthias Hopf wrote:
> > Using radeonhd when the fglrx module has *ever* been loaded during
> > boottime is unsupported, and the driver will probably fail to present a
> > reasonable image. Unloading the module is *not* enough.
> Matthias, it's not that bad :-)  If you load both and you are configured to 
> use

Given the issues we had this scenario is completely unsupported. You may
be lucky, other users have worse experience.

All in all as long as you have fglrx installed you are on your own. It
*might* work, but don't expect support from SuSE when e.g. sax2 doesn't
work. That said, maybe the community has some good ideas to try.

Blacklisting fglrx is not enough, because there is still the different
libGL, which can actually lead to the driver module not loading at all
(remember? AIGLX now requires the Xserver to load libGL as well :-/ ).

CU

Matthias

-- 
Matthias Hopf <mhopf@xxxxxxx>      __        __   __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg   (_   | |  (_   |__          mat@xxxxxxxxx
Phone +49-911-74053-715           __)  |_|  __)  |__  R & D   www.mshopf.de
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx