Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (427 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [radeonhd] [PATCH] EXA as default AccelMethod on r5xx
- From: Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:23:05 -0400
- Message-id: <194f62550905090623j1aebfd3el3a91e94bffd61884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Conn,
Yes I have experienced this case, too.
Especially problematic are cases where you toggle between accelerated
and software-fallback situations, where almost all time is wasted
copying pixmap contents arround.
What would help EXA a lot would probably be a better decision if
something is really worth migration to VRAM.
I have some ideas which probably could help to avoid those worst-cases
altogether, but I don't have time or the knowledge needed to implement
it.
- Clemens
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Back when I was using a machine that had a 5xx and was using
FEA/CFD software that required meshing grids and viewing them, XAA
spanked EXA on performance because it had the hardware accelerated
diagonal line function. When viewing 1.5 million nodes connected
together lines to form pyramid shaped cells that particular feature
helped a lot.
Yes I have experienced this case, too.
Especially problematic are cases where you toggle between accelerated
and software-fallback situations, where almost all time is wasted
copying pixmap contents arround.
What would help EXA a lot would probably be a better decision if
something is really worth migration to VRAM.
I have some ideas which probably could help to avoid those worst-cases
altogether, but I don't have time or the knowledge needed to implement
it.
- Clemens
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |