Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (427 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [radeonhd] [PATCH] EXA as default AccelMethod on r5xx
- From: Matthias Hopf <mhopf@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 11:40:50 +0200
- Message-id: <20090507094050.GA20362@xxxxxxx>
On May 06, 09 17:26:11 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
What is the performance of EXA vs. XAA, what are the benefits?
E.g. for the intel driver both EXA and UXA are currently extremely slow
compared to XAA (which is no longer officially supported), which is
giving us quite some headaches here at SuSE.
I don't think we already support framebuffer resizing - that would be a
reason to move to EXA.
Matthias
--
Matthias Hopf <mhopf@xxxxxxx> __ __ __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ mat@xxxxxxxxx
Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R & D www.mshopf.de
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Yang Zhao <yang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Now that DRI is on by default on r5xx, we might as well set EXA as
default instead of XAA.
What is the performance of EXA vs. XAA, what are the benefits?
E.g. for the intel driver both EXA and UXA are currently extremely slow
compared to XAA (which is no longer officially supported), which is
giving us quite some headaches here at SuSE.
I don't think we already support framebuffer resizing - that would be a
reason to move to EXA.
Matthias
--
Matthias Hopf <mhopf@xxxxxxx> __ __ __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ mat@xxxxxxxxx
Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R & D www.mshopf.de
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |