Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (307 mails)

[Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Manuel Gysin <gwydion.dot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 10.02.2009, 16:27 -0500 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Manuel Gysin <gwydion.dot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > >
> > > is it possible that glxgears is running now? glxinfo too gives no error
> > > and it seems wine would start an 3D application.
> >
> > There is no 3D driver yet so all 3D rendering is done in software.
> >
> > Alex
>
> That is clear. Whole stuff goes to the cpu.
> But I'm confused about that it's running (glxgears, wine).
>
> For one week I got the error about missing r6xx_dri.so or such a thing.
> But now nothing.
> The X.0.log shows that die radeonhd driver is loaded.
>
> Maybe only my home system is broken and it's normal that glxgears is
> working?

yes, it's normal for 3D apps to work even without a 3D driver.  The
software 3D driver does the rendering.

> On the other hand die r600_demo seems broken here. Can't get an BusID
> (and I don't know why it says my card is AGP and radeon is the used
> driver!). This was working for a week.

The drm module is called radeon and is shared by the radeon and
radeonhd xorg drivers.

> *** ./r600_demo, version f355ee7
>
> driver "radeon" version 1.29.0
> driver description "ATI Radeon"
> AGPVendorID: 0000  AGPDeviceId: 0000
> BusID: ""
> GetBufs: error 22 (Invalid argument)

You can ignore the error 22, do any of the tests work?

> glxinfo:
> name of display: :0.0
> display: :0  screen: 0
> direct rendering: Yes
> server glx vendor string: SGI
> server glx version string: 1.2

software rendering.

Alex
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx