Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (145 mails)

["Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Christian König
<deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> first of all: A very big THANK YOU to everybody involved.
>
> Ok, now to the hard work getting this up and running:
> Radeonhd won't even compile after i checked out the r6xx-r7xx-support
> branch. Digging into it i found that gcc is complaining about function
> declaration and definition mismatch in r600_state.h and r6xx_accel.c.
>
> When i take a look into r600_state.h i can see prototypes for a bunch of
> inline functions:
>        inline void e32(drmBufPtr ib, uint32_t dword);
>        inline void efloat(drmBufPtr ib, float f);
>        inline void pack3(drmBufPtr ib, int cmd, unsigned num);
>        inline void pack0 (drmBufPtr ib, uint32_t reg, int num);
>        inline void ereg (drmBufPtr ib, uint32_t reg, uint32_t val);
>
> I don't really know why gcc is complaining about a declaration mismatch
> here, but after moving those functions into the header file and
> commenting out draw_immd in the header file the code seems to compile
> fine. I'm using gcc version 4.3.2 with X.Org X Server 1.5.99.3. Both
> from Ubuntu Jaunty (9.04 Beta). A patch with my changes to radeonhd
> sources is attached, hoping this will help cleaning up the code a little
> bit.

This should be fixed in git.

Alex
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx