Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (148 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [radeonhd] firegl V5200: radeonhd or radeon driver?
  • From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 07:43:20 -0800
  • Message-id: <20081202154320.GB31530@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:04:41PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
> Ok, so even if radeonhd did recognize my chip, the radeon folks said I
> should forget radeonhd and go with radeon.

Just out of curiosity: what reason was stated for that?

None, really, I'm guessing each side says their driver supports the chip, so
you might as well use their driver :)

On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:15:17AM -0600, Alec T. Habig wrote:
I've also got a FireGL 5200 (in a Thinkpad T60p). It's been a lot of
fun to work with the developers and watch support radeonhd grow over the
past year. At one point radeon had better support (redhat and ATI
worked together to quickly patch support into the older driver), but
that work has been integrated into the radeonhd driver since, which is
designed from the ground up for these newer chips.

Thanks, sounds good enough to me.

I'll just go with that then and report back if I still get hangs on 3d after
compiling a recent checkout.

Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >