Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (148 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [radeonhd] firegl V5200: radeonhd or radeon driver?
  • From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:40:35 -0800
  • Message-id: <20081201224035.GB5833@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 04:33:36PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:04:13PM +0000, Mark Struberg wrote:
radeonhd is intended for chips >= R500

This starts with X1300 and later.

For r300 cards you have to use the xf86-video-ati (aka radeon) driver not
the radeonhd.

I know :)
I have a r5xx based FireGL V5200, but the driver seems to use the r3xx 3d
code.

So, it seems to work with either radeon and radeonhd.

Should I however stick with radeon, or try to make radeonhd work?

Ok, so even if radeonhd did recognize my chip, the radeon folks said I
should forget radeonhd and go with radeon.

This is a bit confusing since both
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.laptop/browse_thread/thread/c3fb8f212a9dd911
and
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/ATI_Mobility_FireGL_V5200

mention using radeonhd instead of radeon.

So, could I get a definite answer? :)

Thanks,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups