Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (333 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [radeonhd] RandR connector names [Poll/Discussion]
- From: "Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:05:59 -0400
- Message-id: <a728f9f90810150705o3a7fffaub9a177371da95948@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Matthias Hopf <mhopf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I personally prefer (a) since it seems more logical to me and easier
for users to understand. The physical connectors are what the user
sees. A lot of people don't really know that DVI-I is really a
combination of analog and digital, so it's easy for confusion to arise
when you see more outputs listed than connectors on your card.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
RandR isn't exactly verbose in specifying, what an output actually is.
So far, two interpretations have been used, with one limitation or
another.
Most drivers interpret outputs to be connectors (a), so they have
outputs named like
VGA-1
DVI-1
radeonhd instead uses signal routes as outputs (b), so the same set as
above is specified as 3 outputs, named
VGA-1
DVI-I_1/analog
DVI-I_1/digital
I personally prefer (a) since it seems more logical to me and easier
for users to understand. The physical connectors are what the user
sees. A lot of people don't really know that DVI-I is really a
combination of analog and digital, so it's easy for confusion to arise
when you see more outputs listed than connectors on your card.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |