Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (308 mails)

< Previous Next >
RE: [radeonhd] 0x94C3:0x1545:0x3210: Radeon HD 2400 Pro (PCIe)
  • From: "Bridgman, John" <John.Bridgman@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:00:55 -0400
  • Message-id: <898503EB1E15BA4F944D1BE69D55AAC8AB4607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I think someone mentioned that resizing the fb would be a problem for
XAA and that we would probably have to abandon XAA to enable this. Do we
think this is still the case ?

That said, EXA on Radeon parts is looking a lot better these days.

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Williamson [mailto:awilliamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:57 AM
To: Matthias Hopf
Cc: radeonhd@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [radeonhd] 0x94C3:0x1545:0x3210: Radeon HD 2400 Pro (PCIe)

On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 16:24 +0100, Matthias Hopf wrote:

The "Virtual" keyword is commented out. Without having a large virtual

assigned on startup time, you cannot put one monitor next to the
other.

Is there a plan for improving this in radeonhd? The intel driver guys
plan on allowing the framebuffer allocation to be dynamically (and
automatically) resized, sometime later this year.
--
adamw

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx For additional
commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups