Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (311 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [radeonhd] radeonhd, radeon or ati??
- From: Brad Langhorst <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:16:02 -0500
- Message-id: <1203862562.7742.14.camel@up>
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 13:02 +0100, TommyDrum wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello, I'm getting a little confused on what happened at fosdem,
especially in regards on what is reported on phoronix:
First, on the radeonhd mailing list I had asked about xvideo support on
the R6xx, and Alex responded (essentially) with "it'll happen when Tcore
is released". Today, reading on phoronix, I found out that Alex Deucher
gave xvideo support to the R100 to R400 series on the ati-git tree, and
later on that David Airlie did the same at the R500 series and RS690
on... again the ati-git tree?
I now am officialy confused, as I thought that (based on the xorg wiki
at http://wiki.x.org/wiki/radeonhd) the R5xx and R6xx were supported by
the radeonhd driver, not the ati driver...
Could someone shed some light on all of this please?
They're supported by both...
I, for one, think it's great to see stuff happening in two places at
once.
I don't know much about the technical differences between ati/radeon and
radeonhd - so maybe somebody with some expertise will respond with a
balanced comparison.
Speaking generally (and maybe incorrectly) i think ati/radeon is
evolving to handle the newer chips while radeonhd is a from scratch
effort.
brad
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |