Mailinglist Archive: radeonhd (622 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: CTM: was Re: [radeonhd] Necessary for 3D
- From: Syren Baran <sbaran@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:48:48 +0200
- Message-id: <1191948528.9090.255.camel@excalibur>
Am Montag, den 08.10.2007, 18:23 +0200 schrieb Jerome Glisse:
> As
> side note i don't think anybody will accept security flow just to allow
> few apps to play with the GPU.
Well, i heard rumors of people using PC´s and even connecting them to
the interweb instead of placing it in a safe and dumping it at the
bottom of the ocean...
> I believe we could in the future provide
> with the help of gallium some nice interface for letting application
> taking advantage of GPU without the need for the application to know
> anythings about the card.
If the applications memory range can be checked before execution that
sure wouldnt be a bad idea. Or are you talking about an intermediate
language with references instead of pointers, ala java?
>
> Cheers,
> Jerome Glisse
Syren
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> As
> side note i don't think anybody will accept security flow just to allow
> few apps to play with the GPU.
Well, i heard rumors of people using PC´s and even connecting them to
the interweb instead of placing it in a safe and dumping it at the
bottom of the ocean...
> I believe we could in the future provide
> with the help of gallium some nice interface for letting application
> taking advantage of GPU without the need for the application to know
> anythings about the card.
If the applications memory range can be checked before execution that
sure wouldnt be a bad idea. Or are you talking about an intermediate
language with references instead of pointers, ala java?
>
> Cheers,
> Jerome Glisse
Syren
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |