Mailinglist Archive: proxy-suite (11 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [proxy-suite] Caching
- From: Stephen Fletcher <Stephen.Fletcher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 00:13:30 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012071111430.28229-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ken
Squid does not support transparent ftp proxing, only transparent http. At
least last time I looked and Hendrik did not seem to be keen on even
contemplating adding such support. The reason I use the transparent
patches is so no client configuration is necessary, and I wish it to stay
that way :)
Stephen
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Kenneth L. Hamer wrote:
> Stephen.Fletcher@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > How so?
> > I am using the transparent patches and would like to have often downloaded
> > files automatically cached, I dont want to have to tell users "use your
> > browser if you want caching". Is this what you are suggesting? I know
> > there are som ftp proxies around that use caching. Would someone know one
> > that I could mash into ftp-proxy and not be a problem wuith licensing?
>
> Okay, first I'll say that I don't have implementation details, this is
> just something that *should* work. Although I'm not familiar with the
> transparent patches tp FTP proxy - we don't use it that way.
>
> No, I'm not suggesting to tell them to use their browser. What I was
> thinking is that you could put squid in between them and the FTP proxy.
> Have the connect through squid (either by transparent proxying or
> explicit proxy configuration. Then configure squid to go out through
> the SUSE FTP proxy. Again, that could be done either through explicit
> configuration or through another round of transparent proxying. Squid
> should work with pretty much any FTP client.
>
> I'll admit you might have to work some magic with ipchains to make this
> work on a single machine.
>
> - Ken
>
Stephen Fletcher
NEC Australia
Phone: (02) 6250 8718
Fax: (02) 6250 8775
Squid does not support transparent ftp proxing, only transparent http. At
least last time I looked and Hendrik did not seem to be keen on even
contemplating adding such support. The reason I use the transparent
patches is so no client configuration is necessary, and I wish it to stay
that way :)
Stephen
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Kenneth L. Hamer wrote:
> Stephen.Fletcher@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > How so?
> > I am using the transparent patches and would like to have often downloaded
> > files automatically cached, I dont want to have to tell users "use your
> > browser if you want caching". Is this what you are suggesting? I know
> > there are som ftp proxies around that use caching. Would someone know one
> > that I could mash into ftp-proxy and not be a problem wuith licensing?
>
> Okay, first I'll say that I don't have implementation details, this is
> just something that *should* work. Although I'm not familiar with the
> transparent patches tp FTP proxy - we don't use it that way.
>
> No, I'm not suggesting to tell them to use their browser. What I was
> thinking is that you could put squid in between them and the FTP proxy.
> Have the connect through squid (either by transparent proxying or
> explicit proxy configuration. Then configure squid to go out through
> the SUSE FTP proxy. Again, that could be done either through explicit
> configuration or through another round of transparent proxying. Squid
> should work with pretty much any FTP client.
>
> I'll admit you might have to work some magic with ipchains to make this
> work on a single machine.
>
> - Ken
>
Stephen Fletcher
NEC Australia
Phone: (02) 6250 8718
Fax: (02) 6250 8775
| < Previous | Next > |