Mailinglist Archive: packet-writing (10 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: Performance of packet writing: Blocksize matters
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:07:47 -0500
- Message-id: <458079B3.4080900@xxxxxxxxxx>
Johannes Niess wrote:
Ahh, my eyes glossed over the last digit and just read it as 32k.
Yes.
Let me know how the noop scheduler performs.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: packet-writing+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: packet-writing+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I went for a minimal difference. The second experiment is with block size increased by 1 byte (32k + 1) = 32769. Sorry for not making that obvious. The change was intended to force reblocking. I agree that it is not a real world test.
Ahh, my eyes glossed over the last digit and just read it as 32k.
Will this work?
echo noop > /sys/block/hdc/queue/scheduler
Yes.
Let me know how the noop scheduler performs.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: packet-writing+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: packet-writing+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |