Mailinglist Archive: packet-writing (59 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [packet-writing] packet-writing with Redhat?
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 15:28:43 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <20000924172625.G23237@xxxxxxx>
On Sun, Sep 24 2000, Adam Huffman wrote:
> I got it working after a fashion. The formatted size of the disc was
> about 100Mb too small and when I tried to copy files to the mounted
> disk, I got lots of errors of the form:
Ben is looking into that, it's a bug in cdrwtool
> attempt to access beyond end of device
> 0b:00: rw=0, want=768, limit=2
> huh, 1532 not uptodate
AFAICR, this was caused by pktcdvd detecting a very small capacity
of the disc, right? I'll look into this, I've got a 0.0.2d final
release coming in the next couple of days (and yes, the corruption
issue has finally been nailed 8)
> The device I used was /dev/sr0 on RedHat 6.2 with a SCSI drive, if that
> makes any difference, rather than /dev/scd0 - isn't that for read-only
> drives?
No, it doesn't make a difference, they are indentical.
--
* Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
* SuSE Labs
> I got it working after a fashion. The formatted size of the disc was
> about 100Mb too small and when I tried to copy files to the mounted
> disk, I got lots of errors of the form:
Ben is looking into that, it's a bug in cdrwtool
> attempt to access beyond end of device
> 0b:00: rw=0, want=768, limit=2
> huh, 1532 not uptodate
AFAICR, this was caused by pktcdvd detecting a very small capacity
of the disc, right? I'll look into this, I've got a 0.0.2d final
release coming in the next couple of days (and yes, the corruption
issue has finally been nailed 8)
> The device I used was /dev/sr0 on RedHat 6.2 with a SCSI drive, if that
> makes any difference, rather than /dev/scd0 - isn't that for read-only
> drives?
No, it doesn't make a difference, they are indentical.
--
* Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
* SuSE Labs
| < Previous | Next > |