On 12/22/2016 09:07 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Is it reliable? Can we trust the journal to work and not loose anything in, say, two years time, even after upgrades?
You've descended into the stage of a ridiculous argument, Carlos. Once you start hypothesising that something can be unreliable you can hypothesise that anything and everything can be unrealisable up to an including the kernel. After all its designed by humans, implemented by humans, coded by humans, tested by humans, and we've seen bugs that have defied 'many eyes' for years, haven't we. Humans are fallible. Even the automated stuff, well tat was designed and coded by humans too, so it could have errors that propagate into the 'machine-designed code'. What's to say that there isn't a syndromic bug in ng-syslog that only emerges under certain conditions by causes a runaway write that consumes all disk space? I can hypothesise that just as easily as you can hypothesise a hypothetical about the result of an upgrade to to the journal in two years. Or four years. Or ten years. You've descended into the stage of a ridiculous argument, Carlos. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org