On 11/14/2016 07:44 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Anton Aylward wrote:
On 11/14/2016 02:17 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
[...] Running rsyncd with xinetd allows the system to do a lot more work.
Do you mean 'requires', as in 'do work that alternatives might not require and so places a greater load on the system" or do you mean "offers more options and flexibility" ??
xinetd has a higher listen backlog than rsyncd (3.0.7), that's all.
By "backlog" I presume you mean connection requests that have not yet spawned a server to deal with the it".
[...]
Yes, that is possible, but the main issue is one of apparently inactive clients just hanging around clogging up the system.
Are these clients that have completed the job? Hmm. I take it that you don't really mean 'clients', but instances of the spawned rsyncd. To me, 'clients' are the other end of the connection, the requesters not the servitors. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org