On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Anton Aylward
On 10/03/2016 10:19 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Anton Aylward
wrote: On 10/03/2016 09:55 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-10-03 15:22, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 10/03/2016 08:54 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Carlos E. R. <> wrote:
If you don't like that, then remove the relevant entry from /etc/fstab and create your own unit file specific to that disk.
Absolutely not nice, and an argument against systemd.
Not so! The generator is a 'backwards compatibility' compromise.
fstab semantic under systemd is *NOT* backward compatible. This is permanent source of complaints which are ignored.
I did not say it was 'compatable', I said it was a comparability compromise. Like all compromises it not 'absolutely the same'.
What exactly forced systemd to drop compatible behavior? Why it was not possible to keep compatible behavior UNLESS extra options enabled new - presumably, better - one? Until you can explain this, what you say remains just commonplace without any substance. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org