On 10/03/2016 08:58 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
I'm sure that is/was a genuine problem, but allow me to count it as an exception to prove the rule. I think it is very far from your example to your general suggestion that
"... that if there is a problem I can not edit an script and solve it. I have to wait for the devs to solve and distribute it".
Indeed. As I say in another posting, if you are relying on /etc/fstab and the generator that parses it, you end up with the systemd semantics that maintain the system, automatically restarting when something 'dies' so as to maintain a constant picture. If you want different, take the entry out of fstab and write your own mount file that does what you want. This is not a problem with systemd. It is doing what it supposed to. You haven't told it otherwise. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org