On 06/08/2016 04:49 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-06-08 21:03, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 06/08/2016 01:24 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
If you mean use a screen-scraper tool like KSnapshot then no wonder you get poor quality! no no. A screen capture is by definition "maximum quality" always. It has a defined number of pixels, it is a memory image. There is no possible error.
I disagree. It may well be that the image you are scraping from the screen has a higher definition source. It may be that the original source is a 2650x1800 image that has been rendered down to fit 256x174.
Why not wget the original?
Then it is not a screenshot.
Why is a screenshot so important? To get on the screen it must have come from somewhere. Why no make use of that original somewhere? If its the format you're concerned with, then we get back to the issue of converting. if its a high resolution SVG then there isn't a problem storing the original and converting to a pixel format. If its a low resolution image that's been zoomed then you've lost precision when one pixel gets scaled up to 2..4...8 But that's beside the point. If you had wget the small original you can still scale it up using convert or gimp. What is this obsession with the screen? Like I say, to get on the screen it must have come from somewhere. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org