On 03/23/2016 03:35 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Here is the xorg.0.log from that first attempt: http://files.jessen.ch/zotac-xorg.0.log-20160323-001.txt
It really does not like the "intel" driver you have"
Just in case, this is the dmesg output: http://files.jessen.ch/zotac-dmesg-20160323-001.txt
I note
[ 3.093370] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20150327 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0 [ 3.141069] [drm] GMBUS [i915 gmbus dpc] timed out, falling back to bit banging on pin 4 [ 3.211879] fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb0) is primary device [ 3.515272] [drm:valleyview_update_wm [i915]] *ERROR* timed out waiting for Punit DDR DVFS request
and finally its insisting on
[ 687.123881] [drm:valleyview_update_wm [i915]] *ERROR* timed out waiting for Punit DDR DVFS request
I see in a later post that Felix observes a disparity in datelines. Your chip and your driver are from very different "generations". I've mentioned already the problems I've had with chips of the same nominal 'generation' differing by a few (hundred) iterations, so i'm not surprised by this. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org