On 11/22/2014 08:15 AM, Gour wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:02:47 -0500 Anton Aylward
wrote: * the ROOT FS is implicit, not a subvolume * I had subvolumes for /home, /usr, /var, /tmp and /.snapshots
Do you see any pro/cons in having ROOT FS as subvolume in regard to ability to have snapshots? (My current system has root as subvolume.)
My opinion is this If the ROOT FS is the root then there's no sense it it also being a subvolume ... A subvolume of what? I've installed BtrFs as the ROOT FS for opensuse a few times not in a few variations including it being the only FS, the whole system with lots of subvolumes. It never occurred to me to have it as its own subvolume. And I've never had any problems with snapshots, for examples with zypper. The closest I've had to a "problem" with snapshots is when they were being taken on an hourly basis and eating disk space! Turn that setting OFF! -- /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML Mail / \ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org