Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Carlos E. R.
[10-11-14 06:26]: [...] I certainly prefer traditional syslog to systemd persistent binary logger. Last I heard, searching on it is awfully slow (days) on rotating disks. Fast enough on flash disks.
Up to you. It has some advantages, which you may want/need or not.
But I was not aware that both conflicted, I though you could have both systems installed and running. :-?
I too have rsyslog installed and trying to install systemd-logger announces conflict and since I am somewhat used to and comfortable with rsyslog, it stays. And istr conversation here that agreed with you about co-existance of {r}syslog and systemd-logger, but perhaps the conversation was more about journald.
Looking at my desktop openSUSE-Factory, there is no *journal* package installed. Only systemd provides journalctl and that is the only executable, *journ*, in my path.
Seems the longer I live the more confused I become and I don't believe it is related to the "oldtimer's" condition. Learned "truths" seem to no longer apply and apparently their departure is un-announced in a manner which is visible to me ????
And yet you maintain that the systemd team is correct in gobbling up everything in sight...and as typical for Sievert & POettering, breaking shit left and right, without the slightest bit of remorse, and then blaming the other code for "being broken" rather than admitting that the only bugs are the ones that they keep introducing. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org