Re: [opensuse] Re: unhandy systemd logging

On 06/04/2014 10:40 PM, jdebert wrote:

On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 16:17:32 -0700 Linda Walsh wrote:

...

Anton Aylward wrote:

...

On 06/04/2014 08:26 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:

[ Big Snip ]

What Carlos is saying, what I'm saying, is that this is Linux and its configurable. Its as configurable to the degree that you want to put the effort in to make it so.

---- Considerable effort is being thrown away with a large amount of that configurability being thrown away as well as Systemd absorbs functions and disables configuration options.

Or... can it give me run levels and previous functionality?

In a previous setup I had 8 runlevels, each configured differently for different purposes. (Before that I had 13, which was back when you could actually set up runlevels a thru f.) It doesn't appear that systemd is capable of that or perhaps it simply won't permit it.

One could set up any number of units and run 'systemctl isolate ...' with them as the parameter. Scanning the binary with 'strings' I see single runlevel2.target runlevel3.target runlevel4.target runlevel5.target reboot poweroff halt kexec are there as short-form 'aliases' for 'init'. I don't see 'runlevela.target' and the like, so I don't think 'init a' is going to be mapped by default. However there's nothing stopping you writing a 'runlevela.target' unit and making use of that. However if it were me I'd give it a more meaningful name that just 'a..f'. I must admit to a great deal of curiosity as to what those other six runlevels you had did. -- Courage is resistance of fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org