Felix Miata wrote:
WRT openSUSE: The fence is down. The barn is empty. For all practical purposes the herd has been lost. If you don't want a system dependent on systemd...
Well, that's until it goes a bit too far. Remember, it's just something to help help your system boot faster by doing parallel boot. And now? Seems like it fell a bit short of that initial goal, as well. If you already booted direct from HD and used parallel boot in the run scripts, there seems to be a slowdown. What I don't understand is why people keep converting more to systemd, when it didn't make good on its initial promises. I.e. my system booting the kernel @ enters the BOOT phase 15 seconds later.. that finishes in about 1-2 seconds, and run level 3 finishes coming up about 13-15 seconds later. It does make prettier graphs to explain why it isn't booting up quickly. What this about it taking over the role of process 1? Is it all ready running as 1? If it doesn't get called first, does it complain? I noticed a fork of udev that doesn't require systemd. Seems more people are complaining as time goes on. Also saw some stepped on toes over in samba land. I'm sure the kernel folk are as happy as pie -- as systemd aims to become the arbitrator of system security. Does anyone else think some of the systemd folks might be on MS's payroll under the table?
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
The wise are known for getting walked on by systemd, their understanding of it's quirks has enabled its boiling of the toads.... ;-/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org