On 8/5/2013 11:25 AM, Anton Aylward wrote:
John Andersen said the following on 08/05/2013 01:31 PM:
Then, circling around to the original problem, that if smb or nmb failing to start, does it make more sense to set up one's own smb.service than to fix the problem in the auto generation engine?
It would seem that if opensuse is going to continue to use auto generation that the wisest fix would be to fix that, rather than end-running the entire process.
I think you are so missing the point. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make here,
In my opinion, and I think there is a subtext in the documentation at the threads at 0pointer.de that has led me to this, that the auto-generation of units based on scripts in /etc/init.d is a kludge pending the creation of proper unit files.
You think I'm missing the point and have no idea what my point is, then you proceed to directly answer the question about the autogeneration based on init.d scrips being a kludge. (Is it against your religion to answer a direct question without first preceding it with an insult?) Without some indication by opensuse as to their plans for the future, building custom systemd scripts is likely to cause as many problems as it will solve. Why not fix the sources used by the generators in the current version(s) and wait for formal release of the non-generator version of OS. (Aren't you the one always berating Linda for the degree to which she customizes her system?) Buy the wya, Your own source suggests generators are ok in his pet case: "Generators should only be used to generate unit files, not any other kind of configuration. " -- _____________________________________ ---This space for rent--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org