On 02/26/2013 08:34 PM, Anton Aylward wrote:
j.e.perry@cox.net said the following on 02/26/2013 09:22 PM:
---- Anton Aylward
wrote: I took a look and wonder how this is any different from a syntax directed editor. Kate perhaps, or VIM with a suitable plugin.
It's not. In fact, isn't kate the editor for kdevelop? My point, which I guess I didn't make very well, was that since there is no current fully wsywig html editor, I've found that manual editing, with snippets from the standard maintainers to reduce the dreary long repetitive strings, makes html building easy. Just flipping back and forth between Firefox and kdevelop is as easy as any current dedicated html builder that I found. And I like actually seeing what I'm doing. Ah. yes, but do you get intelligent table building, intelligent CSS and more?
If it a non WYSIWYG (which I can understand since that hides many atrocities -- FF and others will dynamically correct piss-poor HTML and patch over many errors) then aren't there some split screen style HTML editors around? I seem to recall .... my 'yes it used to be but KDE dropped them .." list ...
I build a lot of web pages for genealogy and history web sites. Quanta was the best editor ever. Still get a tear in my eye when I think about it. I now use Bluefish. I really didn't like it at first. I always liked to customize tags that I use all the time. In Quanta it was easy to customize tags. Bluefish is not particularly user friendly in this way. You have to edit an XML file named "snippets" to create custom tags. As I've gotten used to it Bluefish is alright. Would still rather have Quanta back. -- “Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.” -Albert Einstein _ _... ..._ _ _._ ._ ..... ._.. ... .._ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org