Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1483 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Re: ipv4 forwarding - any known issues?
- From: Anders Johansson <ajh@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:29:30 +0100
- Message-id: <1728749.DACgRTQ2qE@carolin>
On Sunday 26 February 2012 08:09:31 James Knott wrote:
local is a special routing table for localhost and broadcast. It is managed by
the kernel
ip r show table 255
There are other reasons for wanting to use multiple routing tables. I have
seen some routing conundrums that could only be solved with them. Such
problems usually involve multiple network cards, and multiple viable paths to
the same host, where the kernel by default makes the wrong choice and you have
to step in and force it to do the right thing
Anders
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Ruediger Meier wrote:
At any given time, how many routing tables would you have in use?
I guess even you have more than one routing table in use. At least 4
ones: local/ipv4, local/ipv6, main/ipv6, main/ipv6.
What are you referring to be local and main? Routing is only used for
destinations that are not on the local network. Therefore, there
shouldn't ben any routing table entries for anything on the local
network.
local is a special routing table for localhost and broadcast. It is managed by
the kernel
ip r show table 255
There are other reasons for wanting to use multiple routing tables. I have
seen some routing conundrums that could only be solved with them. Such
problems usually involve multiple network cards, and multiple viable paths to
the same host, where the kernel by default makes the wrong choice and you have
to step in and force it to do the right thing
Anders
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |