Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1188 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Gnome2 vs. Gnome3. Why not just port the old environment to the new toolkit?
- From: Roger Luedecke <roger.luedecke@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:18:57 -0800
- Message-id: <1326593937.12988.15.camel@linux-jtom.site>
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 18:04 -0800, Steven Hess wrote:
usually ensures significant improvements to KDE itself. But in fact, you
are right. 12.2 proved troublesome enough I rolled back to 11.4 and
chose Gnome as my DE of choice.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Roger LuedeckeHaving been a KDE fan, I tend to look forward to releases since it
<roger.luedecke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 00:41 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:Some of us say nothing and continue to use an older supported stable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----I like compiz simply because it works very well, and smoothly... whereas
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, 2012-01-13 at 13:32 -0800, Roger Luedecke wrote:
Honestly, besides that I'm very much not fond of Gnome Shell there are
other concerns. For example, the insistence of needing 3D acceleration
will be bad for business desktop users who haven't needed such a thing,
and thus require massive upgrades to make Gnome work properly.
Indeed.
Plus,
lets face it... even Grandma can use Gnome 2. The new paradigm isn't an
improvement in usability as anticipated. This concerns me further with
Enterprise users... demo this shit, and see how quickly Windows gets the
upper hand in Enterprise environments.
Unless people go to xfce or similar.
As far as that goes, if we can
accept the issues of hardware acceleration then I would say Cinnamon
essentially has the right idea.
I like it. I hope to see it here.
Reinventing the wheel keeps things from
rolling. I also take issue with abandoning Compiz which is likely the
best compositing thingamajig on the market. Would it be that hard to
port the old style panels and such to GTK3?
I did not like compiz either.
KWin chokes painfully on operations that compiz make look like childs
play.
I personally worry a bit extra when Linus says something sucks. I
By the way:
Linus Torvalds dubs GNOME 3 'unholy mess'
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/05/linus_slams_gnome_three/>
“Linux daddy Linus Torvalds has dropped GNOME 3 in favor of the Xfce
graphical desktop interface, dubbing GNOME 3 an "unholy mess".”
mean... we wouldn't be here were it not for him.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
openSUSE version of our chosen desktop environment and don't rush to
upgrade like headless chickens just because a new release is out.
All releases have horror stories. Some are just worse then others.
Thanks for being test cases those that are.
Steven
--
____________
Steven L Hess ARS KC6KGE DM05gd22
Skype user flamebait Cell 661 487 0357 (Facetime)
Google Voice 661 769 6201
openSUSE Linux 11.4
usually ensures significant improvements to KDE itself. But in fact, you
are right. 12.2 proved troublesome enough I rolled back to 11.4 and
chose Gnome as my DE of choice.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |