Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1103 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse] Re: Is there a leak?
On 11/01/12 12:02, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Mark Misulich<munguanaweza@xxxxxxxxx> [01-10-12 12:37]:
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 14:32 +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:

The other thing is that you sent me the (above) e-mail with the
addressee, me, being "Undisclosed-recipients" rather than having
me as a direct entry in your address book. Who else may be in
this "undisclosed-recipients" entry of yours? If I remember
correctly, if one either replies to an e-mail or Copies the
address the address goes into the Personal Address Book; how an
address gets into the Collected Addresses book I don't know.
However, I am certain that one needs to deliberately create an
"Undisclosed-recipients" entry into which you then manually
enter the addresses - I used to use this to send agendas and
minutes of meetings to members of a committee I belonged to.

So, at this point nothing conclusive - with the exception of
this "undisclosed-recipients" matter .
"undisclosed-recipients" address is *not* the problem here.

Well, we don't know this as a certainty, do we? We don't know what Mark has set up in his TB's Address Book(s).


It merely
indicates that the "To:" header was empty. You can "Cc:" or "Bcc:" w/o
having an address entered in "To:" and the message will be delivered, just
will have the "undisclosed-recipients" address added to the "To:" header
field.


I tested this out before responding (by sending some test messages to my wife, sitting 3 feet away from me :-) ) and you are correct about the BCC: but not the CC: option: you don't get the "Undisclosed-recipients" with the CC: when the To: field is empty.

BC

--
It is easy to convince people of something, but hard to keep them convinced.
Niccolo Machiavelli

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups