On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 09:05 +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 15:28 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote: Do you mean this thread?
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.suse.opensuse.packaging/6475
Seems unclear if the standard libjpeg lib turned out to be the -turbo variant. And there is no note in the docs that comes with libjpeg62 to say that it is compiled form -turbo sources. Still, I do not seem to see an actual libjpeg-turbo.so anywhere. So it mist be the intention that the turbo stuff is in /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0. But who want to assume?
So I downloaded the source rpm for libjpeg-turbo and built it. It makes
libjpeg62-62.0.0-6.1.i586.rpm libjpeg62-devel-62.0.0-6.1.i586.rpm libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1-6.1.i586.rpm
So it looks like the 'standard' /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62.0.0 'might' be this. The problem is that you get the same name for the RPM and library if you build with the standard non-turbo sources. So, following the pedigree of libjpeg.so.62.0.0 installed on some system seems rather uncertain.
Hi, The strong point of libjpeg-turbo is that it's an drop-in replacement for the standard libjpeg. For this to work, obviously, the library name needs to be equal. As such it's not surprising that both install libjpeg.so.62.0.0. If th elib would have a different name, apps would need to be rebuilt explicitly against libjpeg-turbo. Hth, Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org