Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1837 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Moving to IPv6
- From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:27:44 +0200
- Message-id: <i6b1u0$34b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
James Knott wrote:
Just one. AFAICT, multiple phones should not present a problem. The
phones themselves have a NAT keep-alive option, but it's not needed
(because of the STUN dameon).
I'm guessing you meant the reverse - to access multiple, individual
systems _behind_ the NAT? (as Adam Williams suggested). No, in that
situation I access the main gateway, and then ssh on from there.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (17.9°C)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
How many at each location?No problem - I have a number of Linksys/Cisco SPA phones hooked upTry setting up for voice over IP or certain gaming to more than
one computer.
from peoples home offices to our central telephone server. The phone
is usually sat behind a NAT'ing router. This has been working very
well for at least two years now. Of course, I run a stun daemon.
Just one. AFAICT, multiple phones should not present a problem. The
phones themselves have a NAT keep-alive option, but it's not needed
(because of the STUN dameon).
I do that every day from my workstation. (which is behind a NATTry using ssh to multiple computers, without changing
port numbers.
setup).
Do you directly access or connect to one and run another ssh
connection from there?
I'm guessing you meant the reverse - to access multiple, individual
systems _behind_ the NAT? (as Adam Williams suggested). No, in that
situation I access the main gateway, and then ssh on from there.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (17.9°C)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |