Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1761 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Xorg process taking 30% of processor
- From: Anton Aylward <anton.aylward@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:14:05 -0400
- Message-id: <4C75171D.9010009@xxxxxxxxxx>
Peter Suetterlin said the following on 08/25/2010 08:40 AM:
The same could be said of any GUI ...
"we command line fanatics ..."
Why waste money on computer power when a
* radio
* mp3 player
* tv
costs so little?
The answer is the user.
In practice, delivered CPU power has stayed about the same as the
workload and complexity and presentation has grown ore sophisticated.
If I compile things now on my dual-core machine, they seem to go about
as fast as they did on that old PDP-11/45 back at the beginning of the
80, when I had a dumb terminal and a CLI.
Seem to.
And even though DOS3.3/WordPerfect4.2 was the hight of office automation
I'm not producing business letters and printing them an faster than I
did 25 years ago.
Or it doesn't seem that way.
Well, there are some benefits.
This Compaq Presario laptop is a lot lighter and has a bigger, clearer
screen than the 386/20 "luggable" "lunchbox" I had back in 1987, so I'm
not complaining.
--
The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if
there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing
but blind pitiless indifference.
-- Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life (1995),
quoted from Victor J. Stenger, Has Science Found God? (2001)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Rodney Baker wrote:
Turning of KDE4's desktop effects (i.e. suspend compositing) will drop the
CPU usage to near zero again.
While true, this is only a workaround. Wasting 20% of a really powerful
machine for *nothing* (it uses it even if nothing happens) is a bug and not a
blemish....
The same could be said of any GUI ...
"we command line fanatics ..."
Why waste money on computer power when a
* radio
* mp3 player
* tv
costs so little?
The answer is the user.
In practice, delivered CPU power has stayed about the same as the
workload and complexity and presentation has grown ore sophisticated.
If I compile things now on my dual-core machine, they seem to go about
as fast as they did on that old PDP-11/45 back at the beginning of the
80, when I had a dumb terminal and a CLI.
Seem to.
And even though DOS3.3/WordPerfect4.2 was the hight of office automation
I'm not producing business letters and printing them an faster than I
did 25 years ago.
Or it doesn't seem that way.
Well, there are some benefits.
This Compaq Presario laptop is a lot lighter and has a bigger, clearer
screen than the 386/20 "luggable" "lunchbox" I had back in 1987, so I'm
not complaining.
--
The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if
there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing
but blind pitiless indifference.
-- Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life (1995),
quoted from Victor J. Stenger, Has Science Found God? (2001)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |