Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1897 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] two upgraded 11.3 system - but one reports wrong digest??
- From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 08:59:09 +0200
- Message-id: <i2e2vt$n6v$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
David C. Rankin wrote:
Hi David
I've cleared out all repositories on the bad box, so I had expected to
get a clean start, but it's not working. I don't think there is a
checksum file anywhere.
I completely appreciate "bad digest" = "bad package", no question about
that, but "no digest" = "bad package" is different. I just don't
understand why I get this "no digest" situation. You wouldn't happen
to know how the digests are built (locally) ?
Yup. I basically have a new system that I zypper dup'ed to 11.3 - then
I added my own customizations (snmp, hp proliant software, ntp etc),
and somehow ended up in this weird situation.
I'll try that, but isn't it pretty weird that I also get this problem on
license.tar.gz ??
thanks for taking an interest :-)
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (14.1°C)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On 07/23/2010 06:25 AM, Per Jessen wrote:complains
Per Jessen wrote:
What I find really odd is that of the two checksums that yast
about, one is _empty_:
Wrong Digest: The expected checksum of
file /var/tmp/TmpDir.3dKqrq/license.tar.gz
is f9b8e7e5c6af23ab500a0c907f2518bc236c89be, but the current checksum
is .
That is just strange. I don't suppose that you can just move whatever
digest/checksum file from goodbox->bad box can you? I don't know the
answer, but what the devs need to disclose is if the packages that
failed the digest check are (1) good but with a bad digest; or (2) bad
digest = bad package, expect unpredictable results.
Hi David
I've cleared out all repositories on the bad box, so I had expected to
get a clean start, but it's not working. I don't think there is a
checksum file anywhere.
I completely appreciate "bad digest" = "bad package", no question about
that, but "no digest" = "bad package" is different. I just don't
understand why I get this "no digest" situation. You wouldn't happen
to know how the digests are built (locally) ?
Earlier Context:
The 'Retry?' is on the second dialog. After you click, 'Use Anyway?:
No', then you fall back to the dialog with the 'Abort, Ignore,
Retry' options.
Uh, no - when I say 'no', I keep getting lots of other files with
checksum problems. If I say 'no' on the second window (there is no
retry option), yast reverts to the list of repositories.
I figured out what the disconnect in our thinking was, I was talking
about the wrong digest/checksum errors received 'during' install -- if
I understand now, you are talking about after install.
Yup. I basically have a new system that I zypper dup'ed to 11.3 - then
I added my own customizations (snmp, hp proliant software, ntp etc),
and somehow ended up in this weird situation.
If so, the only
thing I could guess at is to try and identify the packages with a bad
checksum stepping though the installed rpms with something like:
for i in $(rpm -qa); do rpm -qi $i >/dev/null; done
I'll try that, but isn't it pretty weird that I also get this problem on
license.tar.gz ??
thanks for taking an interest :-)
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (14.1°C)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |