Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (1390 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [Bulk] Re: Boot configuration. Was Re: [opensuse] Internet monitoring tool
- From: Anton Aylward <anton.aylward@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:22:54 -0500
- Message-id: <4B8DB9EE.5070401@xxxxxxxxxx>
Carlos E. R. said the following on 03/02/2010 07:47 PM:
But surely it has to.
When I shrank the second partition and put a new one in there ...
Are you saying the table entry existed anyway?
Its not about a table, its a bout 'slots'?
Does it have some way of telling zero from a blank entry?
(larry wall apropos quote goes here)
Well a 'slots' approach begs the question about the number of slots for
the partition in the extended partition. Only one extended partition,
you say ...
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
This isn't making any sense. If the order of the cinders is irrelevant
what is the underlying logic.
The partition numbers depends on where in a table is each partition
listed. There are four entries, the first one is numbered "one" - even if
it is physically the last partition in the disk. The table is boss,
pysical layout is arbitrary. Kind of.
Are you saying that the whole thing gets re-written on every edit?
No.
But surely it has to.
When I shrank the second partition and put a new one in there ...
Are you saying the table entry existed anyway?
Its not about a table, its a bout 'slots'?
Does it have some way of telling zero from a blank entry?
(larry wall apropos quote goes here)
Well a 'slots' approach begs the question about the number of slots for
the partition in the extended partition. Only one extended partition,
you say ...
--And the sofware will not
get confused by that. Only us ;-)
Well that last statement is certainly true!
:-)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |